David Brown 880 Implematic or MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 44/6?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 880 Implematic has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the M-H 44/6 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 44/6 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 25% (5.7 L/min / 1.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 880 Implematic and MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 44/6, with the call on each
Question880 ImplematicM-H 44/6Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?31.7 kW (42.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Implematic”32.4 kW (43.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 44-6”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 880 Implematic has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the M-H 44/6 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 880 Implematic and the M-H 44/6.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 880 Implematic and the M-H 44/6.
Which pumps more oil for implements?22.7 L/min (6.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Implematic”28.4 L/min (7.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 44-6”AheadThe MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 44/6 has 25% more hydraulic flow (5.7 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the David Brown 880 Implematic (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,000 kg (2,205 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Implematic”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the M-H 44/6.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,815 kg (4,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Implematic”1,905 kg (4,200 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 44-6”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 880 Implematic and the M-H 44/6.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Implematic”5Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 44-6”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 880 Implematic and the M-H 44/6.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 26 km/h (16.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Implematic”21 km/h (13.0 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 44-6”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Implematic”551 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 44-6”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the M-H 44/6.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 880 Implematic and the M-H 44/6.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Implematic”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 44-6”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1961–19651946–1951Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 880 Implematic is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The MASSEY-HARRIS M-H 44/6 has 25% more hydraulic flow (5.7 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the David Brown 880 Implematic (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The David Brown 880 Implematic is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 880 Implematic has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the M-H 44/6 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources