David Brown 780 Selectamaric or David Brown 880 Selectamatic?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 780 Selectamaric has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 880 Selectamatic has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The David Brown 880 Selectamatic suits road haulage better on this data: 14% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 780 Selectamaric and David Brown 880 Selectamatic, with the call on each
Question780 Selectamaric880 SelectamaticCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?34.3 kW (46.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 780”34.3 kW (46.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 780 Selectamaric has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 880 Selectamatic has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 780 Selectamaric and the 880 Selectamatic.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 780 Selectamaric and the 880 Selectamatic.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—27.5 L/min (7.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 780 Selectamaric.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,306.000 kg (2,879 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 780”1,315 kg (2,899 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,683 kg (3,710 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 780”1,810 kg (3,990 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?2,380 kg (5,247 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 780”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 880 Selectamatic.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 780”6 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 780 Selectamaric and the 880 Selectamatic.
Which is faster on the road?22 km/h (13.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 780”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic”AheadThe David Brown 880 Selectamatic has 14% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the David Brown 780 Selectamaric (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 780”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 780 Selectamaric and the 880 Selectamatic.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 780”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 880 Selectamatic”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1967–19711965–1971EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The David Brown 880 Selectamatic has 14% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the David Brown 780 Selectamaric (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 780 Selectamaric has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 880 Selectamatic has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources