David Brown 770 Selematic or Renault R-57?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 770 Selematic and Renault R-57, with the call on each
Question770 SelematicR-57Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?24.1 kW (32.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 770”23.3 kW (31.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 770 Selematic and the R-57.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 770 Selematic and the R-57.
Which pumps more oil for implements?20.4 L/min (5.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 770”21.2 L/min (5.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?725 kg (1,598 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 770”2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 770 Selematic: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 770”); the R-57: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,464 kg (3,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 770”1,860 kg (4,101 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault R-57 is 27% heavier (396 kg / 873 lb) than the David Brown 770 Selematic (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 770 Selematic and the R-57.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 770”10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 770 Selematic and the R-57.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 770”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 770”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 770 Selematic.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 770”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1965–19701967–1972EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault R-57 is 27% heavier (396 kg / 873 lb) than the David Brown 770 Selematic (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 770 Selematic: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 770”); the R-57: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 57 R7241”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources