David Brown 1694 or VALMET 6800-4?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 1694 and VALMET 6800-4, with the call on each
Question16946800-4Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?73.8 kW (99.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1694”73.0 kW (97.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1694 and the 6800-4.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1694 and the 6800-4.
Which pumps more oil for implements?80.3 L/min (21.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1694.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,375 kg (7,441 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1694”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 6800-4.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,345 kg (9,579 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1694”4,410 kg (9,722 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1694.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1694”12 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1694 and the 6800-4.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1694”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1694”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1694.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1694”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6800”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19881996–2003Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The VALMET 6800-4 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VALMET 6800-4 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources