David Brown 1694 vs OLIVER 1870

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

David Brown 1694

1984–1988

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

OLIVER 1870

1973–1974

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 1694 and the 1870 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

11 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

David Brown 1694 and OLIVER 1870, field by field
Field16941870Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed106.5 hp97.6 hp+9% 1694
Engine declaredDAVID BROWN AD 6/55 TurboMINNEAPOLIS-MOLINE D 451/6differs
Displacement declared5.39 L7.39 L+37% 1870
Maximum torque declared292 lb·ft · 396 N·m
Transmission
Top speed declared18.6 mph · 30 km/h18.6 mph · 30 km/h
Clutch declaredDry double clutchFoot-operated dry single-plate clutchdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declaredOpen centre
Pump flow declared17.4 gpm · 66.0 L/min
Three-point lift at ends declared7,441 lb · 3,375 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540/1000 rpm1000 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared9,579 lb · 4,345 kg12,059 lb · 5,470 kg+26% 1870
Wheelbase declared100.0 in · 2,540 mm111.0 in · 2,819 mm+11% 1870
Length declared167.3 in · 4,250 mm175.5 in · 4,458 mm
Width declared79.0 in · 2,007 mm95.9 in · 2,436 mm+21% 1870
Height declared108.0 in · 2,743 mm85.5 in · 2,172 mm+26% 1694
Ground clearance declared16.5 in · 419 mm21.5 in · 546 mm+30% 1870
Turning radius, braked declared14.5 ft · 4.42 m12.2 ft · 3.71 m+19% 1694
Fuel tank declared143.7 qt · 136.0 L160.1 qt · 151.5 L+11% 1870

David Brown 1694 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1694”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1694”

OLIVER 1870 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1870”