David Brown 1690 (A) or Hürlimann XT 910.4?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 1690 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XT 910.4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Hürlimann XT 910.4 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 10% (4.4 L/min / 1.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Hürlimann XT 910.4 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1690 (A) | XT 910.4 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 75.8 kW (101.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690” | 75.7 kW (101.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1690 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XT 910.4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1690 (A) and the XT 910.4. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1690 (A) and the XT 910.4. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 42.6 L/min (11.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690” | 47.0 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4” | AheadThe Hürlimann XT 910.4 has 10% more hydraulic flow (4.4 L/min / 1.2 gpm) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 3,375 kg (7,441 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1690 (A). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,855 kg (8,499 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690” | 4,410 kg (9,722 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann XT 910.4 is 14% heavier (555 kg / 1,224 lb) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1690 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690” | 45 to 60Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4” | AheadThe Hürlimann XT 910.4 has 275% more forward gears (33 gears) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1690 (A) and the XT 910.4. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4” | AheadThe Hürlimann XT 910.4 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690” | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the XT 910.4. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.4” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1980–1984 | 1995–2004 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann XT 910.4 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hürlimann XT 910.4 has 10% more hydraulic flow (4.4 L/min / 1.2 gpm) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann XT 910.4 is 14% heavier (555 kg / 1,224 lb) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann XT 910.4 has 275% more forward gears (33 gears) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann XT 910.4 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann XT 910.4 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 1690 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XT 910.4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources