David Brown 1690 (A) or Ford 7710?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Ford 7710: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on forward gears and top speed.

  • The Ford 7710 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 62% (26.3 L/min / 6.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Ford 7710 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 1690 (A) and Ford 7710, with the call on each
Question1690 (A)7710Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?64.7 kW (86.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690”64.5 kW (86.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1690 (A) and the 7710.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1690 (A) and the 7710.
Which pumps more oil for implements?42.6 L/min (11.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690”68.9 L/min (18.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”AheadThe Ford 7710 has 62% more hydraulic flow (26.3 L/min / 6.9 gpm) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,255 kg (9,381 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1690 (A).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,855 kg (8,499 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690”4,430 kg (9,766 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 7710 is 15% heavier (575 kg / 1,268 lb) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1690 (A) and the 7710.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690”16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”AheadThe Ford 7710 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1690 (A) and the 7710.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”AheadThe Ford 7710 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 7710.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1690”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 7710”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1980–19841981–1991EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Ford 7710 has 62% more hydraulic flow (26.3 L/min / 6.9 gpm) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 7710 is 15% heavier (575 kg / 1,268 lb) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 7710 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Ford 7710 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the David Brown 1690 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources