David Brown 1494 (A) or Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the David Brown 1494 (A): three-point lift. On features, the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 is ahead on forward gears.

  • The David Brown 1494 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 14% (332 kg / 732 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 1494 (A) and Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50, with the call on each
Question1494 (A)DX 3.50Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?41.1 kW (55.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1494”40.7 kW (54.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1494 (A) and the DX 3.50.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1494 (A) and the DX 3.50.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—38.0 L/min (10.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1494 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,732 kg (6,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1494”2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”AheadThe David Brown 1494 (A) has 14% more lift (332 kg / 732 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,347 kg (7,379 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1494”2,730 kg (6,019 lb) to 3,120 kg (6,878 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?—4,600 kg (10,141 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1494 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1494”16Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the David Brown 1494 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1494 (A) and the DX 3.50.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1494”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1494”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1494 (A).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1494”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19881984–1996EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The David Brown 1494 (A) has 14% more lift (332 kg / 732 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the David Brown 1494 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources