David Brown 1494 (A) or Deutz (KHD) D 6206?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the David Brown 1494 (A) is ahead on forward gears and PTO speeds.

  • The David Brown 1494 (A) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 1494 (A) and Deutz (KHD) D 6206, with the call on each
Question1494 (A)D 6206Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?41.1 kW (55.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1494”41.1 kW (55.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6206”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1494 (A) and the D 6206.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1494 (A) and the D 6206.
Which pumps more oil for implements?27.4 L/min (7.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6206”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1494 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,732 kg (6,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1494”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 6206.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,347 kg (7,379 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1494”2,225 kg (4,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6206”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 1494 (A) is 50% heavier (1,122 kg / 2,474 lb) than the Deutz D 6206 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6206”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1494 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1494”8 to 9Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6206”AheadThe David Brown 1494 (A) has 33% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Deutz D 6206 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1494 (A) and the D 6206.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1494”20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6206”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1494”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6206”AheadThe David Brown 1494 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz D 6206 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6206”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1494 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1494”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 6206”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19881974–1980Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 1494 (A) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The David Brown 1494 (A) is 50% heavier (1,122 kg / 2,474 lb) than the Deutz D 6206 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The David Brown 1494 (A) has 33% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Deutz D 6206 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The David Brown 1494 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz D 6206 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The David Brown 1494 (A) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources