David Brown 1410 (A) or OLIVER 1650 (4WD)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the OLIVER 1650 (4WD): hydraulic flow. On features, the David Brown 1410 (A) is ahead on top speed and drive.
- The OLIVER 1650 (4WD) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 26% (9.5 L/min / 2.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The David Brown 1410 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
- The David Brown 1410 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 14% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1410 (A) | 1650 (4WD) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 48.5 kW (65.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | 48.5 kW (65.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1650” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1410 (A) and the 1650 (4WD). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1410 (A) and the 1650 (4WD). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | 45.5 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1650” | AheadThe OLIVER 1650 (4WD) has 26% more hydraulic flow (9.5 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the David Brown 1410 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,630 kg (8,003 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1650 (4WD). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,265 kg (7,198 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | 3,545 kg (7,815 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1650” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1410 (A) and the 1650 (4WD). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | 6 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1650” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1410 (A) and the 1650 (4WD). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | 22 km/h (13.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1650” | AheadThe David Brown 1410 (A) has 14% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the OLIVER 1650 (4WD) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | 550 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1650” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 1650 (4WD). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1410 (A) and the 1650 (4WD). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1650” | AheadThe David Brown 1410 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the OLIVER 1650 (4WD) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1974–1980 | 1964–1969 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 1410 (A) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The OLIVER 1650 (4WD) has 26% more hydraulic flow (9.5 L/min / 2.5 gpm) than the David Brown 1410 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The David Brown 1410 (A) has 14% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the OLIVER 1650 (4WD) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The David Brown 1410 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the OLIVER 1650 (4WD) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The David Brown 1410 (A) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources