David Brown 1410 (A) or J.I. Case 841?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the J.I. Case 841: hydraulic flow. On features, the David Brown 1410 (A) is ahead on forward gears and drive.

  • The J.I. Case 841 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 63% (22.7 L/min / 6.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The David Brown 1410 (A) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 1410 (A) and J.I. Case 841, with the call on each
Question1410 (A)841Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?48.5 kW (65.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”48.5 kW (65.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 841”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1410 (A) and the 841.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1410 (A) and the 841.
Which pumps more oil for implements?36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”58.7 L/min (15.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 841”AheadThe J.I. Case 841 has 63% more hydraulic flow (22.7 L/min / 6.0 gpm) than the David Brown 1410 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,630 kg (8,003 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 841.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,265 kg (7,198 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”3,132 kg (6,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 841”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1410 (A) and the 841.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”8Traktorenlexikon, “Case 841”AheadThe David Brown 1410 (A) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the J.I. Case 841 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1410 (A) and the 841.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 841”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 841”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 841”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1410 (A).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 841”AheadThe David Brown 1410 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 841 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1974–19801960–1969Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 1410 (A) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The J.I. Case 841 has 63% more hydraulic flow (22.7 L/min / 6.0 gpm) than the David Brown 1410 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The David Brown 1410 (A) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the J.I. Case 841 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The David Brown 1410 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 841 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The David Brown 1410 (A) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources