David Brown 1410 (A) or Hürlimann H-480 (A)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1410 (A) | H-480 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 48.5 kW (65.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | 48.6 kW (65.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 480” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1410 (A) and the H-480 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1410 (A) and the H-480 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | 34.8 L/min (9.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 480” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,630 kg (8,003 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | 1,920 kg (4,233 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 480” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 1410 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”); the H-480 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 480”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,265 kg (7,198 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | 3,049 kg (6,722 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 480” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1410 (A) and the H-480 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | 12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 480” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1410 (A) and the H-480 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 480” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 480” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1410 (A) and the H-480 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 480” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1974–1980 | 1979–1982 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-480 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hürlimann H-480 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 1410 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”); the H-480 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 480”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources