David Brown 1410 (A) or Hürlimann D-210 (A) Synchromatic?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the David Brown 1410 (A): three-point lift.

  • The David Brown 1410 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 38% (990 kg / 2,183 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 1410 (A) and Hürlimann D-210 (A) Synchromatic, with the call on each
Question1410 (A)D-210 (A) SynchromaticCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?48.5 kW (65.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”48.2 kW (64.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1410 (A) and the D-210 (A) Synchromatic.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1410 (A) and the D-210 (A) Synchromatic.
Which pumps more oil for implements?36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,630 kg (8,003 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”2,640 kg (5,820 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”AheadThe David Brown 1410 (A) has 38% more lift (990 kg / 2,183 lb) than the Hürlimann D-210 (A) Synchromatic (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,265 kg (7,198 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”2,850 kg (6,283 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 1410 (A) is 15% heavier (415 kg / 915 lb) than the Hürlimann D-210 (A) Synchromatic (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1410 (A) and the D-210 (A) Synchromatic.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”12Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1410 (A) and the D-210 (A) Synchromatic.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1410 (A) and the D-210 (A) Synchromatic.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1410”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1974–19801972–1974EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The David Brown 1410 (A) has 38% more lift (990 kg / 2,183 lb) than the Hürlimann D-210 (A) Synchromatic (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The David Brown 1410 (A) is 15% heavier (415 kg / 915 lb) than the Hürlimann D-210 (A) Synchromatic (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources