David Brown 1294 (A) or Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K): hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on PTO speeds.
- The Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 43% (11.6 L/min / 3.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 1294 (A) | R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 41.2 kW (55.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1294” | 41.2 kW (55.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1294 (A) and the R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1294 (A) and the R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 26.8 L/min (7.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1294” | 38.4 L/min (10.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860” | AheadThe Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K) has 43% more hydraulic flow (11.6 L/min / 3.1 gpm) than the David Brown 1294 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,757 kg (3,874 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1294” | 1,867 kg (4,116 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,865 kg (6,316 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1294” | 2,490 kg (5,490 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 1294 (A) is 15% heavier (375 kg / 827 lb) than the Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1294 (A) and the R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1294” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1294 (A) and the R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1294” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1294” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860” | AheadThe Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the David Brown 1294 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1294 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1294” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6860” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1984–1985 | 1988–2000 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K) has 43% more hydraulic flow (11.6 L/min / 3.1 gpm) than the David Brown 1294 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The David Brown 1294 (A) is 15% heavier (375 kg / 827 lb) than the Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Landini R-6860 (DT) TL-21 N/K (TL-21 DT/K) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the David Brown 1294 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources