David Brown 1290 (A) or Eicher 554 S?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Eicher 554S is ahead on forward gears, PTO speeds and drive.

  • The Eicher 554S suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 1290 (A) and Eicher 554 S, with the call on each
Question1290 (A)554 SCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?35.7 kW (47.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1290”35.6 kW (47.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1290 (A) and the 554 S.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1290 (A) and the 554 S.
Which pumps more oil for implements?28.4 L/min (7.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1290”26.0 L/min (6.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?——No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1290 (A) and the 554 S.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,630 kg (5,798 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1290”1,935 kg (4,266 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 1290 (A) is 36% heavier (695 kg / 1,532 lb) than the Eicher 554S (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1290 (A) and the 554 S.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1290”16Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”AheadThe Eicher 554S has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the David Brown 1290 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?—YesTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1290 (A).
Which is faster on the road?—25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”No figureNo call on top speed: no figure on record for the 1290 (A).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1290”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”AheadThe Eicher 554S offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the David Brown 1290 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1290”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1290”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”AheadThe Eicher 554S is available with four-wheel drive; the David Brown 1290 (A) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1980–19841981–1986EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The David Brown 1290 (A) is 36% heavier (695 kg / 1,532 lb) than the Eicher 554S (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Eicher 554S has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the David Brown 1290 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Eicher 554S offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the David Brown 1290 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Eicher 554S is available with four-wheel drive; the David Brown 1290 (A) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and top speed.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources