David Brown 1212 or SAME Minitauro 60?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the David Brown 1212: hydraulic flow. On features, the SAME Minitauro 60 is ahead on drive.

  • The David Brown 1212 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 57% (12.0 L/min / 3.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 1212 and SAME Minitauro 60, with the call on each
Question1212Minitauro 60Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?39.1 kW (52.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1212”39.1 kW (52.39 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1212 and the Minitauro 60.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1212 and the Minitauro 60.
Which pumps more oil for implements?33.0 L/min (8.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1212”21.0 L/min (5.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60”AheadThe David Brown 1212 has 57% more hydraulic flow (12.0 L/min / 3.2 gpm) than the SAME Minitauro 60 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,960 kg (4,321 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1212.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,720 kg (5,997 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1212”1,910 kg (4,211 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 1212 is 42% heavier (810 kg / 1,786 lb) than the SAME Minitauro 60 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1212 and the Minitauro 60.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1212”8 to 14Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1212 and the Minitauro 60.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1212”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1212”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1212 and the Minitauro 60.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1212”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitauro 60”AheadThe SAME Minitauro 60 is available with four-wheel drive; the David Brown 1212 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1971–19761972–1978EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The David Brown 1212 has 57% more hydraulic flow (12.0 L/min / 3.2 gpm) than the SAME Minitauro 60 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The David Brown 1212 is 42% heavier (810 kg / 1,786 lb) than the SAME Minitauro 60 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Minitauro 60 is available with four-wheel drive; the David Brown 1212 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources