David Brown 1212 or Fiat 640 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the David Brown 1212: hydraulic flow. On features, the Fiat 640 (DT) is ahead on drive.

  • The David Brown 1212 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 51% (11.2 L/min / 3.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 1212 and Fiat 640 (DT), with the call on each
Question1212640 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?39.1 kW (52.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1212”39.1 kW (52.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1212 and the 640 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1212 and the 640 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?33.0 L/min (8.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1212”21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT”AheadThe David Brown 1212 has 51% more hydraulic flow (11.2 L/min / 3.0 gpm) than the Fiat 640 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,250 kg (4,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1212.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,720 kg (5,997 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1212”2,350 kg (5,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The David Brown 1212 is 16% heavier (370 kg / 816 lb) than the Fiat 640 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,700 kg (8,157 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1212.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1212”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1212 and the 640 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1212”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1212”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1212 and the 640 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1212”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiat 640/640 DT”AheadThe Fiat 640 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the David Brown 1212 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1971–19761973–1982EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The David Brown 1212 has 51% more hydraulic flow (11.2 L/min / 3.0 gpm) than the Fiat 640 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The David Brown 1212 is 16% heavier (370 kg / 816 lb) than the Fiat 640 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fiat 640 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the David Brown 1212 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources