David Brown 1200 Selectmatic or Hürlimann D-200 Synchromatic?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the David Brown 1200 Selectmatic is ahead on drive.

  • The David Brown 1200 Selectmatic suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for David Brown 1200 Selectmatic and Hürlimann D-200 Synchromatic, with the call on each
Question1200 SelectmaticD-200 SynchromaticCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?41.9 kW (56.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1200”42.1 kW (56.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 200 Synchromatic”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 1200 Selectmatic and the D-200 Synchromatic.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 1200 Selectmatic and the D-200 Synchromatic.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—34.5 L/min (9.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 200 Synchromatic”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1200 Selectmatic.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—2,120 kg (4,674 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 200 Synchromatic”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1200 Selectmatic.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,825 kg (6,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1200”2,790 kg (6,151 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 200 Synchromatic”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,580 kg (7,893 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1200”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D-200 Synchromatic.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1200”12Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 200 Synchromatic”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1200 Selectmatic and the D-200 Synchromatic.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1200”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 200 Synchromatic”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1200”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 200 Synchromatic”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1200”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D-200 Synchromatic.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1200”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 200 Synchromatic”AheadThe David Brown 1200 Selectmatic is available with four-wheel drive; the Hürlimann D-200 Synchromatic is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1967–19711969–1973EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The David Brown 1200 Selectmatic is available with four-wheel drive; the Hürlimann D-200 Synchromatic is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources