Daimler-Benz MB trac 65/70 or Landini R-6500 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MB trac 65/70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-6500 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Daimler-Benz MB trac 65/70 and Landini R-6500 (DT), with the call on each
QuestionMB trac 65/70R-6500 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?48 kW (64 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 65/70”47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6500”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MB trac 65/70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-6500 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MB trac 65/70 and the R-6500 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MB trac 65/70 and the R-6500 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?40 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 65/70”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the R-6500 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—2,650 kg (5,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6500”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MB trac 65/70.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,310 kg (7,297 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 65/70”2,210 kg (4,872 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6500”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Daimler-Benz MB trac 65/70 is 50% heavier (1,100 kg / 2,425 lb) than the Landini R-6500 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MB trac 65/70 and the R-6500 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 65/70”12Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6500”AheadThe Landini R-6500 (DT) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Daimler-Benz MB trac 65/70 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 65/70”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the R-6500 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 65/70”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Landini 6500”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 65/70”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6500”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MB trac 65/70 and the R-6500 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Mercedes-Benz MB trac 65/70”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Landini 6500”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1973–19751973–1983EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Daimler-Benz MB trac 65/70 is 50% heavier (1,100 kg / 2,425 lb) than the Landini R-6500 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Landini R-6500 (DT) has 50% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Daimler-Benz MB trac 65/70 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MB trac 65/70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-6500 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources