Claas Celtis 436 vs Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 85
4 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because the drive differs (4WD; Two-wheel or four-wheel drive). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
4 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | Celtis 436 | Agroplus 85 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 83 hp | 82.9 hp | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 246 lb·ft · 333 N·m | 250 lb·ft · 339 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | — | Open centre | — |
| Pump flow declared | 18.2 gpm · 69 L/min | — | — |
| Pressure declared | 2,611 psi · 180 bar | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | — | 10,803 lb · 4,900 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540 rpm / 1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 8,289 lb · 3,760 kg | 8,378 lb · 3,800 kg | — |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | — | 13,669 lb · 6,200 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 98.0 in · 2,489 mm | 92.1 in · 2,340 mm | +6% Celtis 436 |
| Length declared | 152.4 in · 3,872 mm | 146.2 in · 3,714 mm | — |
| Width declared | 98.8 in · 2,510 mm | 81.1 in · 2,060 mm | +22% Celtis 436 |
| Height declared | 104.5 in · 2,654 mm | 103.3 in · 2,624 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 16.5 in · 420 mm | 18.6 in · 472 mm | +12% Agroplus 85 |
| Fuel tank declared | 153.2 qt · 145 L | 147.9 qt · 140 L | — |
Claas Celtis 436 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Celtis 436”
- Source: OECD test report 2220, 2005
Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 85 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agroplus 85”