Case-Steyr M 958 (a) or ZETOR Proxima 70 (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the ZETOR Proxima 70 (A): hydraulic flow.

  • The ZETOR Proxima 70 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 62% (19.2 L/min / 5.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-Steyr M 958 (a) and ZETOR Proxima 70 (A), with the call on each
QuestionM 958 (a)Proxima 70 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?40.4 kW (54.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 958”40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 70”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the M 958 (a) and the Proxima 70 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the M 958 (a) and the Proxima 70 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?30.8 L/min (8.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 958”50.0 L/min (13.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 70”AheadThe ZETOR Proxima 70 (A) has 62% more hydraulic flow (19.2 L/min / 5.1 gpm) than the Case-Steyr M 958 (a) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,220 kg (4,894 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 958”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Proxima 70 (A).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,360 kg (5,203 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 958”3,350 kg (7,385 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 70”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR Proxima 70 (A) is 42% heavier (990 kg / 2,183 lb) than the Case-Steyr M 958 (a) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,200 kg (9,259 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 958”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Proxima 70 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 958”10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 70”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the M 958 (a) and the Proxima 70 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 958”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 70”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 958”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 70”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the M 958 (a) and the Proxima 70 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 958”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor Proxima 70”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1996–20012011–2016Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR Proxima 70 (A) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The ZETOR Proxima 70 (A) has 62% more hydraulic flow (19.2 L/min / 5.1 gpm) than the Case-Steyr M 958 (a) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR Proxima 70 (A) is 42% heavier (990 kg / 2,183 lb) than the Case-Steyr M 958 (a) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR Proxima 70 (A) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources