Case-Steyr M 9086 a or New Holland T 5040?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the M 9086 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 5040 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The New Holland T 5040 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 37% (17.9 L/min / 4.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 12% (500 kg / 1,102 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | M 9086 a | T 5040 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 63.3 kW (84.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9086 a” | 63.3 kW (84.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the M 9086 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 5040 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the M 9086 a and the T 5040. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the M 9086 a and the T 5040. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 48.1 L/min (12.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9086 a” | 66.0 L/min (17.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040” | AheadThe New Holland T 5040 has 37% more hydraulic flow (17.9 L/min / 4.7 gpm) than the Case-Steyr M 9086a (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9086 a” | 4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040” | AheadThe New Holland T 5040 has 12% more lift (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the Case-Steyr M 9086a (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,950 kg (8,708 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9086 a” | 3,805 kg (8,389 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9086 a” | 6,200 kg (13,669 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9086 a” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the M 9086 a and the T 5040. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9086 a” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 430/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9086 a” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the M 9086 a. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9086 a” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1995–2003 | 2008–2012 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T 5040 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland T 5040 has 37% more hydraulic flow (17.9 L/min / 4.7 gpm) than the Case-Steyr M 9086a (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland T 5040 has 12% more lift (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the Case-Steyr M 9086a (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland T 5040 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the M 9086 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 5040 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources