Case-Steyr M 9078 (a) or Renault 85-32 MX?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the M 9078 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 85-32 MX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Case-Steyr M 9078 (a) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 16% (6.7 L/min / 1.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 12% (475 kg / 1,047 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Case-Steyr M 9078 (a) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-Steyr M 9078 (a) and Renault 85-32 MX, with the call on each
QuestionM 9078 (a)85-32 MXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?57.4 kW (77.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9078”57.4 kW (77.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the M 9078 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 85-32 MX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the M 9078 (a) and the 85-32 MX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the M 9078 (a) and the 85-32 MX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?48.1 L/min (12.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9078”41.4 L/min (10.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”AheadThe Case-Steyr M 9078 (a) has 16% more hydraulic flow (6.7 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the Renault 85-32 MX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9078”3,825 kg (8,433 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”AheadThe Case-Steyr M 9078 (a) has 12% more lift (475 kg / 1,047 lb) than the Renault 85-32 MX (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,750 kg (8,267 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9078”3,420 kg (7,540 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,500 kg (14,330 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9078”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 85-32 MX.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9078”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the M 9078 (a) and the 85-32 MX.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9078”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?430/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9078”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the M 9078 (a).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr M 9078”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”AheadThe Case-Steyr M 9078 (a) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 85-32 MX is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1994–20031989–1993Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-Steyr M 9078 (a) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-Steyr M 9078 (a) has 16% more hydraulic flow (6.7 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the Renault 85-32 MX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-Steyr M 9078 (a) has 12% more lift (475 kg / 1,047 lb) than the Renault 85-32 MX (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-Steyr M 9078 (a) is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 85-32 MX is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Case-Steyr M 9078 (a) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the M 9078 (a) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 85-32 MX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources