Case-Steyr 9105 a or John Deere 6506?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9105 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6506 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-Steyr 9105 a suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9105 a | 6506 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 77.3 kW (103.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105” | 77.3 kW (103.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6506” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9105 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6506 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9105 a and the 6506. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9105 a and the 6506. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 60.0 L/min (15.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6506” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 9105 a. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,100 kg (15,653 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105” | 5,830 kg (12,853 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6506” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 9105 a: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105”); the 6506: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6506”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,015 kg (11,056 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105” | 4,650 kg (10,251 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6506” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105” | 7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6506” | AheadThe Case-Steyr 9105 a has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the John Deere 6506 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105” | 20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6506” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9105 a and the 6506. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6506” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6506” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6506” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6506” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1995–2003 | 1995–1997 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-Steyr 9105 a has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the John Deere 6506 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9105 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6506 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 9105 a: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105”); the 6506: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6506”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources