Case-Steyr 9105 a or John Deere 3055?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9105 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3055 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Case-Steyr 9105 a suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 16% (695 kg / 1,532 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-Steyr 9105 a and John Deere 3055, with the call on each
Question9105 a3055Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?77.3 kW (103.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105”77.3 kW (103.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3055”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9105 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3055 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9105 a and the 3055.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9105 a and the 3055.
Which pumps more oil for implements?91.5 L/min (24.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3055”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 9105 a.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,100 kg (15,653 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 3055.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,015 kg (11,056 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105”4,320 kg (9,524 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3055”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-Steyr 9105 a is 16% heavier (695 kg / 1,532 lb) than the John Deere 3055 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 3055.
Which has the wider choice of gears?20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105”16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3055”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9105 a and the 3055.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3055”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3055”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105”independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3055”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9105”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3055”AheadThe Case-Steyr 9105 a is available with four-wheel drive; the John Deere 3055 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1995–20031992–1993EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-Steyr 9105 a is 16% heavier (695 kg / 1,532 lb) than the John Deere 3055 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-Steyr 9105 a is available with four-wheel drive; the John Deere 3055 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9105 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3055 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources