CASE-INTERNATIONAL 885 (DT) or David Brown 1490 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 885 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1490 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 885 (DT) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for CASE-INTERNATIONAL 885 (DT) and David Brown 1490 (A), with the call on each
Question885 (DT)1490 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?61 kW (82 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 885”61 kW (82 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1490”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 885 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1490 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 885 (DT) and the 1490 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 885 (DT) and the 1490 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?—33.6 L/min (8.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1490”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 885 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,345 kg (5,170 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 885”2,019 kg (4,451 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1490”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 885 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 885”); the 1490 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1490”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,014 kg (6,645 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 885”3,140 kg (6,923 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1490”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 885 (DT) and the 1490 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 885”12Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1490”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 885 (DT) and the 1490 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 885”—No figureNo call on top speed: no figure on record for the 1490 (A).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 885”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1490”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 885”independentTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1490”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 885”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1490”AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 885 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the David Brown 1490 (A) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1985–19901980–1984Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 885 (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 885 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the David Brown 1490 (A) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 885 (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 885 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1490 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 885 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 885”); the 1490 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “David Brown 1490”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and top speed.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources