CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) or Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 685 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 4.70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 10% (6.2 L/min / 1.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 161% (3,840 kg / 8,466 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 685 (DT) | Agrotron 4.70 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 50.7 kW (68.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 50.7 kW (68.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 685 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 4.70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 685 (DT) and the Agrotron 4.70. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 685 (DT) and the Agrotron 4.70. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 59.8 L/min (15.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 66.0 L/min (17.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 has 10% more hydraulic flow (6.2 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,380 kg (5,247 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 6,220 kg (13,713 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 has 161% more lift (3,840 kg / 8,466 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,647 kg (5,836 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 3,890 kg (8,576 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 is 47% heavier (1,243 kg / 2,740 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 685 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 21 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 has 31% more forward gears (5 gears) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 685 (DT) and the Agrotron 4.70. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 685” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1985–1990 | 1995–1997 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 has 10% more hydraulic flow (6.2 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 has 161% more lift (3,840 kg / 8,466 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 is 47% heavier (1,243 kg / 2,740 lb) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 has 31% more forward gears (5 gears) than the CASE-INTERNATIONAL 685 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 685 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 4.70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources