CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) or Hürlimann H-350 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 485 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-350 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 485 (DT) | H-350 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485” | 38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 485 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-350 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 485 (DT) and the H-350 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 485 (DT) and the H-350 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 45.7 L/min (12.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the H-350 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,560 kg (3,439 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485” | 2,410 kg (5,313 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 485 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485”); the H-350 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,358 kg (5,199 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485” | 1,980 kg (4,365 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) is 19% heavier (378 kg / 833 lb) than the Hürlimann H-350 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 485 (DT) and the H-350 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 485 (DT) and the H-350 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Hürlimann H-350 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | AheadThe CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann H-350 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1985–1990 | 1982–1986 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) is 19% heavier (378 kg / 833 lb) than the Hürlimann H-350 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Hürlimann H-350 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The CASE-INTERNATIONAL 485 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann H-350 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 485 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-350 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 485 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 485”); the H-350 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources