Case-IH STX 325 or New Holland T 9020?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH STX 325 and New Holland T 9020, with the call on each
QuestionSTX 325T 9020Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?217.6 kW (291.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”213.1 kW (285.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T9020”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the STX 325 and the T 9020.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the STX 325 and the T 9020.
Which pumps more oil for implements?154.8 L/min (40.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”153.7 L/min (40.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T9020”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?8,770 kg (19,335 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”7,107 kg (15,668 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T9020”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the STX 325: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”); the T 9020: lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T9020”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?14,485 kg (31,934 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”14,649 kg (32,296 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T9020”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?17,700 kg (39,022 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”17,963 kg (39,602 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T9020”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?17Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”16Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T9020”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the STX 325 and the T 9020.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T9020”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T9020”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T9020”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the STX 325.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T9020”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2000–20052007–2010Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T 9020 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland T 9020 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the STX 325: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 325”); the T 9020: lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T9020”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources