Case-IH STX 275 or New Holland TJ-275?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Case-IH STX 275: hydraulic flow and three-point lift.
- The Case-IH STX 275 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 42% (64.8 L/min / 17.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 23% (1,661 kg / 3,662 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | STX 275 | TJ-275 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 178.2 kW (239.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 275” | 178.2 kW (239.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the STX 275 and the TJ-275. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the STX 275 and the TJ-275. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 219.6 L/min (58.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 275” | 154.8 L/min (40.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | AheadThe Case-IH STX 275 has 42% more hydraulic flow (64.8 L/min / 17.1 gpm) than the New Holland TJ-275 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,770 kg (19,335 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 275” | 7,109 kg (15,673 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | AheadThe Case-IH STX 275 has 23% more lift (1,661 kg / 3,662 lb) than the New Holland TJ-275 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 14,422 kg (31,795 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 275” | 14,422 kg (31,795 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 15,000 kg (33,069 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 275” | 15,000 kg (33,069 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 17Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 275” | 16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the STX 275. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 275” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 275” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the STX 275 and the TJ-275. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH STX 275” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TJ275” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2000–2005 | 2001–2005 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH STX 275 has 42% more hydraulic flow (64.8 L/min / 17.1 gpm) than the New Holland TJ-275 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH STX 275 has 23% more lift (1,661 kg / 3,662 lb) than the New Holland TJ-275 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources