Case-IH Puma 210 or Steyr-Case 9220 a?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Puma 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9220 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH Puma 210 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 249% (7,460 kg / 16,446 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Puma 210 | 9220 a | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 156.7 kW (210.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 210” | 157.5 kW (211.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9220 a” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Puma 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9220 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Puma 210 and the 9220 a. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Puma 210 and the 9220 a. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 112.4 L/min (29.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9220 a” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Puma 210. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 10,460 kg (23,060 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 210” | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9220 a” | AheadThe Case-IH Puma 210 has 249% more lift (7,460 kg / 16,446 lb) than the Steyr-Case 9220a (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,200 kg (18,078 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 210” | 8,103 kg (17,864 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9220 a” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 210” | 11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9220 a” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 28Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 210” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9220 a” | Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the Puma 210. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9220 a” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Puma 210. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 210” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9220 a” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 210” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9220 a” | Sources disagreeNo call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the Puma 210. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 210” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 9220 a. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 210”; OECD test report 2427, 2008 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9220 a” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2007–2011 | 1997–1999 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH Puma 210 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH Puma 210 has 249% more lift (7,460 kg / 16,446 lb) than the Steyr-Case 9220a (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH Puma 210 is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Puma 210 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9220 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the Puma 210.
- No call on PTO speeds: sources disagree on the PTO speeds of the Puma 210.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources