5 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneCase-IH Puma 2102007–2011No measured PTO figureTractor twoNew Holland T 70602007–2011No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Puma 210 and the T 7060 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

5 material differences · 10 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH Puma 210 and New Holland T 7060, field by field
FieldPuma 210T 7060Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed210.1 hp210.1 hp—
Engine declaredIVECO-NEF 667 TAIVECO-NEF 667 TA (TIER-III)differs
Displacement declared6.73 L6.73 L—
Maximum torque declared622 lb·ft · 843 N·m622 lb·ft · 843 N·m—
Transmission
Top speed declared24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h—
Clutch declaredElectro-hydraulically operated wet Case-New-Holland multi-disc driving clutchElectro-hydraulically operated wet Case-New Holland multi-disc clutchdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declaredClosed centre——
Hydraulic control declaredLoad sensing——
Pressure declared2,756 psi · 190 bar——
Rear PTO speeds declared540E/1000 rpm540/540E/1000 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared18,078 lb · 8,200 kg18,078 lb · 8,200 kg—
Maximum permissible mass declared26,455 lb · 12,000 kg26,455 lb · 12,000 kg—
Wheelbase declared113.5 in · 2,884 mm113.5 in · 2,884 mm—
Length declared201.2 in · 5,110 mm189.6 in · 4,816 mm+6% Puma 210
Width declared84.1–133.7 in · 2,135–3,395 mm84.1–133.7 in · 2,135–3,395 mm—
Height, over the cab declared120.1 in · 3,050 mm119.9 in · 3,045 mm—
Ground clearance declared17.7 in · 450 mm16.5 in · 420 mm+7% Puma 210
Fuel tank declared433.2 qt · 410.0 L428.0 qt · 405.0 L—

Case-IH Puma 210 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 210”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 6050 Elite”
  • Source: OECD test report 2427, 2008

New Holland T 7060 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T7060 Power Command”