Case-IH Puma 195 vs Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 210

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2003–2004

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Puma 195 and the Agrotron 210 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

8 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH Puma 195 and Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 210, field by field
Field	Puma 195	Agrotron 210	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	194.3 hp	195.4 hp	—
Engine declared	IVECO-N.E.F. 667 TA/EBC	Deutz BF6M 1013 FC	differs
Displacement declared	6.73 L	7.15 L	+6% Agrotron 210
Maximum torque declared	607 lb·ft · 823 N·m	638 lb·ft · 865 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	Load sensing	—
Pump flow declared	35.6 gpm · 134.8 L/min	—	—
Pressure declared	2,756 psi · 190 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	23,149 lb · 10,500 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540E/1000 rpm	540E/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	17,637 lb · 8,000 kg	18,541 lb · 8,410 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	30,865 lb · 14,000 kg	+17% Agrotron 210
Wheelbase declared	113.5 in · 2,884 mm	121.6 in · 3,089 mm	+7% Agrotron 210
Length declared	201.2 in · 5,110 mm	196.9 in · 5,002 mm	—
Width declared	84.1 in · 2,135 mm	108.3 in · 2,750 mm	+29% Agrotron 210
Height declared	120.1 in · 3,050 mm	128.1 in · 3,255 mm	+7% Agrotron 210
Ground clearance declared	17.7 in · 450 mm	21.3 in · 540 mm	+20% Agrotron 210
Fuel tank declared	433.2 qt · 410.0 L	581.2 qt · 550 L	+34% Agrotron 210

Source

Source