Case-IH Puma 180 vs Hürlimann SX 1800

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2000–2004

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Puma 180 and the SX 1800 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH Puma 180 and Hürlimann SX 1800, field by field
Field	Puma 180	SX 1800	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	179.6 hp	177.6 hp	—
Engine declared	IVECO-NEF 667 TA	SAME-DEUTZ-FAHR 1000.6 WTI-3V	differs
Displacement declared	6.73 L	6.00 L	+12% Puma 180
Maximum torque declared	592 lb·ft · 802 N·m	553 lb·ft · 750 N·m	+7% Puma 180
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	—	—
Pump flow declared	35.9 gpm · 135.8 L/min	29.9 gpm · 113.0 L/min	+20% Puma 180
Pressure declared	2,756 psi · 190 bar	3,046 psi · 210 bar	+11% SX 1800
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	22,046 lb · 10,000 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540E/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	18,034 lb · 8,180 kg	15,653 lb · 7,100 kg	+15% Puma 180
Maximum permissible mass declared	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	113.5 in · 2,884 mm	112.2 in · 2,850 mm	—
Length declared	193.5 in · 4,916 mm	191.4 in · 4,861 mm	—
Width declared	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	95.5 in · 2,426 mm	+12% SX 1800
Height declared	119.7 in · 3,040 mm	116.9 in · 2,970 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	15.7 in · 400 mm	23.4 in · 594 mm	+49% SX 1800
Fuel tank declared	433.2 qt · 410.0 L	422.7 qt · 400.0 L	—

Source

Source