Case-IH Puma 165 vs Lamborghini 135

14 material differences

Tractor one

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1998–2004

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Puma 165 and the 135 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

14 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH Puma 165 and Lamborghini 135, field by field
Field	Puma 165	135	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	164.7 hp	133.2 hp	+24% Puma 165
Engine declared	—	SAME 1000.6 WT-3 V1	—
Displacement declared	—	6.00 L	—
Maximum torque declared	540 lb·ft · 731.8 N·m	435 lb·ft · 590 N·m	+24% Puma 165
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	electrohydraulically operated wet Case-New Holland multi-plate driving clutch	Hydraulically operated wet SLH multi-disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	—	—
Pump flow declared	39.1 gpm · 148.1 L/min	28.8 gpm · 109.0 L/min	+36% Puma 165
Pressure declared	2,756 psi · 190 bar	3,046 psi · 210 bar	+11% 135
Three-point lift at ends declared	23,060 lb · 10,460 kg	18,960 lb · 8,600 kg	+22% Puma 165
Rear PTO speeds declared	540E/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	17,891 lb · 8,115 kg	14,771 lb · 6,700 kg	+21% Puma 165
Maximum permissible mass declared	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	23,149 lb · 10,500 kg	+14% Puma 165
Wheelbase declared	113.5 in · 2,884 mm	108.3 in · 2,750 mm	—
Length declared	193.5 in · 4,916 mm	170.1 in · 4,320 mm	+14% Puma 165
Width declared	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	96.5 in · 2,450 mm	+13% 135
Height declared	119.7 in · 3,040 mm	113.4 in · 2,880 mm	+6% Puma 165
Ground clearance declared	18.7 in · 475 mm	20.5 in · 520 mm	+9% 135
Fuel tank declared	433.2 qt · 410.0 L	401.5 qt · 380.0 L	+8% Puma 165

Source

Source