9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneCase-IH Puma 1552007–2011No measured PTO figureTractor twoRenault Ares 816 RZ2001–2005No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Puma 155 and the Ares 816 RZ → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

9 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH Puma 155 and Renault Ares 816 RZ, field by field
FieldPuma 155Ares 816 RZGap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed155.8 hp153.9 hp—
Engine declaredIVECO-N.E.F. 667 TA/EEJJOHN DEERE 6068 TRT 70differs
Displacement declared6.73 L6.79 L—
Maximum torque declared477 lb·ft · 647 N·m434 lb·ft · 588 N·m+10% Puma 155
Transmission
Top speed declared24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h24.9 mph · 40 km/hdiffers
Clutch declaredElectro-hydraulically operated wet Case-New Holland multi-disc clutchGIMA multi-plate clutch running in oil bathdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared—Closed centre—
Hydraulic control declaredLoad sensing——
Pump flow declared27.6 gpm · 104.4 L/min——
Pressure declared2,466 psi · 170 bar2,176 psi · 150 bar+13% Puma 155
Rear PTO speeds declared540/1000 rpm540/1000 rpm—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared14,584 lb · 6,615 kg16,094 lb · 7,300 kg+10% Ares 816 RZ
Maximum permissible mass declared23,149 lb · 10,500 kg25,970 lb · 11,780 kg+12% Ares 816 RZ
Wheelbase declared109.7 in · 2,786 mm113.2 in · 2,876 mm—
Length declared183.7 in · 4,665 mm192.1 in · 4,880 mm—
Width declared85.2–114.2 in · 2,165–2,900 mm100.4 in · 2,550 mmdiffers
Height, over the cab declared124.2 in · 3,155 mm119.5 in · 3,035 mm—
Ground clearance declared18.7 in · 475 mm21.7 in · 550 mm+16% Ares 816 RZ
Turning radius, braked declared—16.1 ft · 4.90 m—
Fuel tank declared317.0 qt · 300.0 L317.0 qt · 300.0 L—

Case-IH Puma 155 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 155”

Renault Ares 816 RZ sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 816 RZ”
  • Source: OECD test report 2108, 2004
  • Source: OECD test report 2108, 2004