Case-IH Puma 155 vs Lamborghini 135

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1998–2004

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Puma 155 and the 135 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH Puma 155 and Lamborghini 135, field by field
Field	Puma 155	135	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	155.8 hp	133.2 hp	+17% Puma 155
Engine declared	IVECO-N.E.F. 667 TA/EEJ	SAME 1000.6 WT-3 V1	differs
Displacement declared	6.73 L	6.00 L	+12% Puma 155
Maximum torque declared	477 lb·ft · 647 N·m	435 lb·ft · 590 N·m	+10% Puma 155
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Electro-hydraulically operated wet Case-New Holland multi-disc clutch	Hydraulically operated wet SLH multi-disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	—	—
Pump flow declared	27.6 gpm · 104.4 L/min	28.8 gpm · 109.0 L/min	—
Pressure declared	2,466 psi · 170 bar	3,046 psi · 210 bar	+24% 135
Three-point lift at ends declared	18,204 lb · 8,257 kg	18,960 lb · 8,600 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	14,584 lb · 6,615 kg	14,771 lb · 6,700 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	23,149 lb · 10,500 kg	23,149 lb · 10,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	109.7 in · 2,786 mm	108.3 in · 2,750 mm	—
Length declared	183.7 in · 4,665 mm	170.1 in · 4,320 mm	+8% Puma 155
Width declared	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	96.5 in · 2,450 mm	+13% 135
Height declared	124.2 in · 3,155 mm	113.4 in · 2,880 mm	+10% Puma 155
Ground clearance declared	18.7 in · 475 mm	20.5 in · 520 mm	+9% 135
Fuel tank declared	317.0 qt · 300.0 L	401.5 qt · 380.0 L	+27% 135

Source

Source