Case-IH Puma 155 vs Case-IH Puma 165

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the Puma 155 and the Puma 165 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH Puma 155 and Case-IH Puma 165, field by field
Field	Puma 155	Puma 165	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	155.8 hp	164.7 hp	+6% Puma 165
Engine declared	IVECO-N.E.F. 667 TA/EEJ	—	—
Displacement declared	6.73 L	—	—
Maximum torque declared	477 lb·ft · 647 N·m	540 lb·ft · 731.8 N·m	+13% Puma 165
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Electro-hydraulically operated wet Case-New Holland multi-disc clutch	electrohydraulically operated wet Case-New Holland multi-plate driving clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Closed centre	—
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	Load sensing	—
Pump flow declared	27.6 gpm · 104.4 L/min	39.1 gpm · 148.1 L/min	+42% Puma 165
Pressure declared	2,466 psi · 170 bar	2,756 psi · 190 bar	+12% Puma 165
Three-point lift at ends declared	18,204 lb · 8,257 kg	23,060 lb · 10,460 kg	+27% Puma 165
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540E/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	14,584 lb · 6,615 kg	17,891 lb · 8,115 kg	+23% Puma 165
Maximum permissible mass declared	23,149 lb · 10,500 kg	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	+14% Puma 165
Wheelbase declared	109.7 in · 2,786 mm	113.5 in · 2,884 mm	—
Length declared	183.7 in · 4,665 mm	193.5 in · 4,916 mm	+5% Puma 165
Width declared	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	—
Height declared	124.2 in · 3,155 mm	119.7 in · 3,040 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	18.7 in · 475 mm	18.7 in · 475 mm	—
Fuel tank declared	317.0 qt · 300.0 L	433.2 qt · 410.0 L	+37% Puma 165

Source

Source