Case-IH MXU 135 Maxxum or Fiat M 135?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fiat M 135: maximum permissible mass.

  • The Fiat M 135 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH MXU 135 Maxxum and Fiat M 135, with the call on each
QuestionMXU 135 MaxxumM 135Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?89.6 kW (120.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU135”90.3 kW (121.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MXU 135 Maxxum and the M 135.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MXU 135 Maxxum and the M 135.
Which pumps more oil for implements?91.5 L/min (24.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU135”97.3 L/min (25.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,996 kg (13,219 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU135”5,060 kg (11,155 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the MXU 135 Maxxum: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU135”); the M 135: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,452 kg (12,020 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU135”5,356 kg (11,808 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU135”9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135”AheadThe Fiat M 135 has 20% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Case-IH MXU 135 Maxxum (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU135”18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MXU 135 Maxxum and the M 135.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU135”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540E/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU135”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MXU 135 Maxxum and the M 135.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU135”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2003–20061996–1999Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MXU 135 Maxxum is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fiat M 135 has 20% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Case-IH MXU 135 Maxxum (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH MXU 135 Maxxum is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the MXU 135 Maxxum: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU135”); the M 135: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri M135”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources