Case-IH MXU 125 or Massey Ferguson MF 6280 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MXU 125: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 2231); the MF 6280 (A): power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6280”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6280 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 16% (13.2 L/min / 3.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 18% (1,094 kg / 2,412 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6280 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 23% (1,700 kg / 3,748 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH MXU 125 and Massey Ferguson MF 6280 (A), with the call on each
QuestionMXU 125MF 6280 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?86.6 kW (116.1 hp)OECD Test 2231Measured PTO power is 6% below the claimed engine power (gross or net not stated) (91.9 kW (123.2 hp)) — a different quantity: the gap is what the engine claim does not reach the shaft.87.2 kW (116.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6280”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MXU 125: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 2231); the MF 6280 (A): power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6280”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MXU 125 and the MF 6280 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?71.8 kW (96.3 hp)OECD Test 2231No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 6280 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?82.5 L/min (21.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”95.7 L/min (25.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6280”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6280 (A) has 16% more hydraulic flow (13.2 L/min / 3.5 gpm) than the Case-IH MXU 125 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,006 kg (13,241 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”7,100 kg (15,653 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6280”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6280 (A) has 18% more lift (1,094 kg / 2,412 lb) than the Case-IH MXU 125 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,473 kg (12,066 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”4,815 kg (10,615 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6280”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MXU 125 is 14% heavier (658 kg / 1,451 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 6280 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”9,200 kg (20,283 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6280”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6280 (A) has 23% higher maximum permissible mass (1,700 kg / 3,748 lb) than the Case-IH MXU 125 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6280”Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the MXU 125.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MXU 125 and the MF 6280 (A).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6280”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540E/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6280”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6280”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDOECD test report 2231, 2005; OECD test report 2259, 2005; Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6280”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2003–20061999–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6280 (A) has 16% more hydraulic flow (13.2 L/min / 3.5 gpm) than the Case-IH MXU 125 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6280 (A) has 18% more lift (1,094 kg / 2,412 lb) than the Case-IH MXU 125 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH MXU 125 is 14% heavier (658 kg / 1,451 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 6280 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6280 (A) has 23% higher maximum permissible mass (1,700 kg / 3,748 lb) than the Case-IH MXU 125 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MXU 125: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 2231); the MF 6280 (A): power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6280”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the MXU 125.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources