Case-IH MXU 125 or Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MXU 125: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 2231); the Agrotron 135 MK3: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH MXU 125 and Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3, with the call on each
QuestionMXU 125Agrotron 135 MK3Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?86.6 kW (116.1 hp)OECD Test 2231Measured PTO power is 6% below the claimed engine power (gross or net not stated) (91.9 kW (123.2 hp)) — a different quantity: the gap is what the engine claim does not reach the shaft.89.7 kW (120.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MXU 125: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 2231); the Agrotron 135 MK3: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MXU 125 and the Agrotron 135 MK3.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?71.8 kW (96.3 hp)OECD Test 2231—No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 135 MK3.
Which pumps more oil for implements?82.5 L/min (21.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”72.8 L/min (19.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3”AheadThe Case-IH MXU 125 has 13% more hydraulic flow (9.7 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,006 kg (13,241 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”9,240 kg (20,371 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3 has 54% more lift (3,234 kg / 7,130 lb) than the Case-IH MXU 125 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,473 kg (12,066 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”5,360 kg (11,817 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3 has 20% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Case-IH MXU 125 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3”Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the MXU 125.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MXU 125 and the Agrotron 135 MK3.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540E/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDOECD test report 2231, 2005; OECD test report 2259, 2005; Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU125”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2003–20062000–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH MXU 125 has 13% more hydraulic flow (9.7 L/min / 2.6 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3 has 54% more lift (3,234 kg / 7,130 lb) than the Case-IH MXU 125 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3 has 20% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the Case-IH MXU 125 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MXU 125: power at the PTO, measured by a laboratory at maximum power (OECD Test 2231); the Agrotron 135 MK3: power at the PTO, claimed (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 135 MK3”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the MXU 125.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources