Case-IH MXU 110 or Fendt 313 Vario?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fendt 313 Vario: maximum permissible mass.

  • The Fendt 313 Vario suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH MXU 110 and Fendt 313 Vario, with the call on each
QuestionMXU 110313 VarioCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?80.0 kW (107.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU110”Measured 7% above its own claimed PTO figure (80.0 kW (107.3 hp), Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU110”).87.2 kW (116.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 313 Vario”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MXU 110 and the 313 Vario.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?73.0 kW (97.9 hp)OECD Test 2240No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 313 Vario.
Which pumps more oil for implements?83.3 L/min (22.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU110”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 313 Vario.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,192 kg (7,037 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 313 Vario”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MXU 110.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,188 kg (11,438 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU110”4,450 kg (9,811 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 313 Vario”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MXU 110 is 17% heavier (738 kg / 1,627 lb) than the Fendt 313 Vario (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU110”8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 313 Vario”AheadThe Fendt 313 Vario has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the Case-IH MXU 110 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 24 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU110”Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 313 Vario”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH MXU 110 has 16 to 24 forward gears and the Fendt 313 Vario is stepless (CVT) — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt 313 Vario”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MXU 110.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU110”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 313 Vario”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540E/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU110”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 313 Vario.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU110”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 313 Vario.
Which drives on both axles?4WDOECD test report 2240, 2005; OECD test report 2245, 2005; Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXU110”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt 313 Vario”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2004–20062012–Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt 313 Vario is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH MXU 110 is 17% heavier (738 kg / 1,627 lb) than the Fendt 313 Vario (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt 313 Vario has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,000 kg / 2,205 lb) than the Case-IH MXU 110 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt 313 Vario is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Case-IH MXU 110 has 16 to 24 forward gears and the Fendt 313 Vario is stepless (CVT) — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources