Case-IH MXM 120 vs Claas Ares 657 ATZ
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the MXM 120 and the Ares 657 ATZ → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
7 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | MXM 120 | Ares 657 ATZ | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 122.3 hp | 123.2 hp | — |
| Engine declared | IVECO 675 TA/HD | — | — |
| Displacement declared | 7.48 L | — | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 372 lb·ft · 505 N·m | 350 lb·ft · 474.9 N·m | +6% MXM 120 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | Closed centre | — | — |
| Hydraulic control declared | Load sensing | — | — |
| Pump flow declared | 32.1 gpm · 121.5 L/min | — | — |
| Pressure declared | 2,466 psi · 170 bar | 2,901 psi · 200 bar | +18% Ares 657 ATZ |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 14,925 lb · 6,770 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540E/540/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 11,995 lb · 5,441 kg | 11,089 lb · 5,030 kg | +8% MXM 120 |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 18,739 lb · 8,500 kg | 19,401 lb · 8,800 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 107.2 in · 2,723 mm | 111.0 in · 2,820 mm | — |
| Length declared | 184.8 in · 4,694 mm | 203.1 in · 5,160 mm | +10% Ares 657 ATZ |
| Width declared | 79.2 in · 2,012 mm | 100.4 in · 2,550 mm | +27% Ares 657 ATZ |
| Height declared | 119.3 in · 3,030 mm | 118.5 in · 3,010 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 15.6 in · 395 mm | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 301.2 qt · 285.0 L | 264.2 qt · 250 L | +14% MXM 120 |
Case-IH MXM 120 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM120”
- Source: OECD test report 2086, 2003
Claas Ares 657 ATZ sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Claas Ares 657 ATZ”
- Source: OECD test report 2294, 2005