Case-IH MXM 175 Maxxum or Renault Ares 826 RZ?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault Ares 826 RZ: three-point lift.
- The Renault Ares 826 RZ suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 65% (4,565 kg / 10,064 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MXM 175 Maxxum | Ares 826 RZ | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 115.0 kW (154.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | 117.5 kW (157.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 826 RZ” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MXM 175 Maxxum and the Ares 826 RZ. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MXM 175 Maxxum and the Ares 826 RZ. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 105.0 L/min (27.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Ares 826 RZ. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,995 kg (15,421 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | 11,560 kg (25,485 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 826 RZ” | AheadThe Renault Ares 826 RZ has 65% more lift (4,565 kg / 10,064 lb) than the Case-IH MXM 175 Maxxum (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,165 kg (15,796 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | 7,730 kg (17,042 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 826 RZ” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | 11,780 kg (25,970 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 826 RZ” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 28Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | 18 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 826 RZ” | Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the Ares 826 RZ. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MXM 175 Maxxum and the Ares 826 RZ. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 826 RZ” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | 540/1000 rpmOECD test report 2129, 2004 | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 826 RZ” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM175” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 826 RZ”; OECD test report 2129, 2004 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2007 | 2001–2004 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault Ares 826 RZ has 65% more lift (4,565 kg / 10,064 lb) than the Case-IH MXM 175 Maxxum (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the Ares 826 RZ.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources