Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum or URSUS 1634?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MXM 155 Maxxum has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1634 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 48% (2,315 kg / 5,104 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum suits road haulage better on this data: 18% (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) more maximum permissible mass and 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MXM 155 Maxxum | 1634 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 114 kW (153 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 114 kW (153 hp)Wikipedia (pl): Ursus 1634 (open data) | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MXM 155 Maxxum has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1634 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MXM 155 Maxxum and the 1634. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MXM 155 Maxxum and the 1634. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 120.3 L/min (31.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1634. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,138 kg (15,737 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 4,823 kg (10,633 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1634” | AheadThe Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum has 48% more lift (2,315 kg / 5,104 lb) than the URSUS 1634 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,320 kg (13,933 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 6,195 kg (13,658 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1634” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1634” | AheadThe Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum has 18% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the URSUS 1634 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 28Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 12Wikipedia (pl): Ursus 1634 (open data) | AheadThe Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum has 50% more forward gears (6 gears) than the URSUS 1634 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MXM 155 Maxxum and the 1634. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 27 km/h (16.8 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1634” | AheadThe Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the URSUS 1634 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540E/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1634” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1634. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MXM155” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1634” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2007 | 1990–2009 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum has 48% more lift (2,315 kg / 5,104 lb) than the URSUS 1634 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum has 18% higher maximum permissible mass (1,500 kg / 3,307 lb) than the URSUS 1634 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum has 50% more forward gears (6 gears) than the URSUS 1634 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the URSUS 1634 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH MXM 155 Maxxum is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MXM 155 Maxxum has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1634 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources