Case-IH MX 90 C vs ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007)

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1998–2000

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2002–2007

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MX 90 C and the 8641 (2002-2007) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH MX 90 C and ZETOR 8641 (2002-2007), field by field
Field	MX 90 C	8641 (2002-2007)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	88.8 hp	78.9 hp	+13% MX 90 C
Engine declared	PERKINS-FASTRAM 1004-40 Turbo-HR	ZETOR Z-1203	differs
Displacement declared	3.99 L	4.16 L	—
Maximum torque declared	236 lb·ft · 320 N·m	251 lb·ft · 340 N·m	+6% 8641 (2002-2007)
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated wet multi-plate driving clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Pump flow declared	23.4 gpm · 88.4 L/min	15.1 gpm · 57.0 L/min	+55% MX 90 C
Pressure declared	3,408 psi · 235 bar	3,046 psi · 210 bar	+12% MX 90 C
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	12,456 lb · 5,650 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/750/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	11,199 lb · 5,080 kg	9,381 lb · 4,255 kg	+19% MX 90 C
Maximum permissible mass declared	17,229 lb · 7,815 kg	14,771 lb · 6,700 kg	+17% MX 90 C
Wheelbase declared	95.4 in · 2,422 mm	94.4 in · 2,397 mm	—
Length declared	175.2 in · 4,450 mm	167.1 in · 4,245 mm	—
Width declared	92.8 in · 2,357 mm	86.2 in · 2,190 mm	+8% MX 90 C
Height declared	112.4 in · 2,855 mm	109.4 in · 2,780 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	15.2 in · 385 mm	14.3 in · 362 mm	+6% MX 90 C
Turning radius, braked declared	—	15.9 ft · 4.85 m	—
Fuel tank declared	199.7 qt · 189.0 L	190.2 qt · 180.0 L	—

Source

Source