Case-IH MX 90 C or VALMET 6350 HiTech?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MX 90 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6350 HiTech has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Case-IH MX 90C suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 26% (18.4 L/min / 4.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The VALMET 6350 HiTech suits road haulage better on this data: 15% (1,185 kg / 2,612 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | MX 90 C | 6350 HiTech | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C” | 66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6350 HiTech” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MX 90 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6350 HiTech has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MX 90 C and the 6350 HiTech. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MX 90 C and the 6350 HiTech. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 88.4 L/min (23.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C” | 70.0 L/min (18.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6350 HiTech” | AheadThe Case-IH MX 90C has 26% more hydraulic flow (18.4 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the VALMET 6350 HiTech (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 5,600 kg (12,346 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6350 HiTech” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MX 90 C. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,080 kg (11,199 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C” | 4,770 kg (10,516 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6350 HiTech” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 7,815 kg (17,229 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C” | 9,000 kg (19,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6350 HiTech” | AheadThe VALMET 6350 HiTech has 15% higher maximum permissible mass (1,185 kg / 2,612 lb) than the Case-IH MX 90C (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C” | 36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6350 HiTech” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MX 90 C and the 6350 HiTech. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6350 HiTech” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6350 HiTech” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6350 HiTech” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C”; OECD test report 1929, 2000 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 6350 HiTech” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2000 | 1999–2006 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Case-IH MX 90C has 26% more hydraulic flow (18.4 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the VALMET 6350 HiTech (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The VALMET 6350 HiTech has 15% higher maximum permissible mass (1,185 kg / 2,612 lb) than the Case-IH MX 90C (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MX 90 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6350 HiTech has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources