Case-IH MX 90 C or SAME Golden 85 Compatto (SAME)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Case-IH MX 90 C: hydraulic flow.

  • The Case-IH MX 90 C suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 162% (54.6 L/min / 14.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Case-IH MX 90 C and SAME Golden 85 Compatto (SAME), with the call on each
QuestionMX 90 CGolden 85 CompattoCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?56.2 kW (75.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C”56.3 kW (75.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 85 Compatto”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MX 90 C and the Golden 85 Compatto.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MX 90 C and the Golden 85 Compatto.
Which pumps more oil for implements?88.4 L/min (23.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C”33.8 L/min (8.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 85 Compatto”AheadThe Case-IH MX 90 C has 162% more hydraulic flow (54.6 L/min / 14.4 gpm) than the SAME Golden 85 Compatto (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,712 kg (3,774 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 85 Compatto”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the MX 90 C.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,080 kg (11,199 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C”2,510 kg (5,534 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 85 Compatto”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH MX 90 C is 102% heavier (2,570 kg / 5,666 lb) than the SAME Golden 85 Compatto (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,815 kg (17,229 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Golden 85 Compatto.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C”16 to 45Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 85 Compatto”Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the Golden 85 Compatto.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MX 90 C and the Golden 85 Compatto.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 85 Compatto”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C”540/1000 rpmOECD test report 1839, 1999EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C”independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 85 Compatto”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH MX90C”; OECD test report 1929, 20004WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Golden 85 Compatto”; OECD test report 1839, 1999EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20001998–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH MX 90 C has 162% more hydraulic flow (54.6 L/min / 14.4 gpm) than the SAME Golden 85 Compatto (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Case-IH MX 90 C is 102% heavier (2,570 kg / 5,666 lb) than the SAME Golden 85 Compatto (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the Golden 85 Compatto.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources