Case-IH MX 90 C vs New Holland T 5040

13 material differences

Tractor one

1998–2000

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2008–2012

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MX 90 C and the T 5040 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

13 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH MX 90 C and New Holland T 5040, field by field
Field	MX 90 C	T 5040	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	88.8 hp	84.9 hp	—
Engine declared	PERKINS-FASTRAM 1004-40 Turbo-HR	IVECO-NEF F4CE 9484 N	differs
Displacement declared	3.99 L	4.49 L	+12% T 5040
Maximum torque declared	236 lb·ft · 320 N·m	254 lb·ft · 345 N·m	+8% T 5040
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated wet multi-plate driving clutch	Electrohydraulically actuated wet multi-disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Pump flow declared	23.4 gpm · 88.4 L/min	17.4 gpm · 66.0 L/min	+34% MX 90 C
Pressure declared	3,408 psi · 235 bar	3,336 psi · 230 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	10,582 lb · 4,800 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/540E/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	11,199 lb · 5,080 kg	8,389 lb · 3,805 kg	+34% MX 90 C
Maximum permissible mass declared	17,229 lb · 7,815 kg	13,669 lb · 6,200 kg	+26% MX 90 C
Wheelbase declared	95.4 in · 2,422 mm	92.2 in · 2,342 mm	—
Length declared	175.2 in · 4,450 mm	158.7 in · 4,030 mm	+10% MX 90 C
Width declared	92.8 in · 2,357 mm	78.9 in · 2,005 mm	+18% MX 90 C
Height declared	112.4 in · 2,855 mm	100.2 in · 2,546 mm	+12% MX 90 C
Ground clearance declared	15.2 in · 385 mm	—	—
Fuel tank declared	199.7 qt · 189.0 L	134.2 qt · 127.0 L	+49% MX 90 C

Source

Source