Case-IH MX 90 C vs Hürlimann H-658 XA

13 material differences

Tractor one

1998–2000

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2000–2004

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the MX 90 C and the H-658 XA → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

13 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Case-IH MX 90 C and Hürlimann H-658 XA, field by field
Field	MX 90 C	H-658 XA	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	88.8 hp	82 hp	+9% MX 90 C
Engine declared	PERKINS-FASTRAM 1004-40 Turbo-HR	Hürlimann 1000.4 WT-4	differs
Displacement declared	3.99 L	4.00 L	—
Maximum torque declared	236 lb·ft · 320 N·m	226 lb·ft · 306 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated wet multi-plate driving clutch	Pedal operated dry SDF single disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Hydraulic control declared	—	Load sensing	—
Pump flow declared	23.4 gpm · 88.4 L/min	11.8 gpm · 44.5 L/min	+99% MX 90 C
Pressure declared	3,408 psi · 235 bar	3,046 psi · 210 bar	+12% MX 90 C
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/540E/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	11,199 lb · 5,080 kg	5,864 lb · 2,660 kg	+91% MX 90 C
Maximum permissible mass declared	17,229 lb · 7,815 kg	11,023 lb · 5,000 kg	+56% MX 90 C
Wheelbase declared	95.4 in · 2,422 mm	86.2 in · 2,190 mm	+11% MX 90 C
Length declared	175.2 in · 4,450 mm	153.5 in · 3,900 mm	+14% MX 90 C
Width declared	92.8 in · 2,357 mm	80.7 in · 2,050 mm	+15% MX 90 C
Height declared	112.4 in · 2,855 mm	98.0 in · 2,490 mm	+15% MX 90 C
Ground clearance declared	15.2 in · 385 mm	15.0 in · 380 mm	—
Fuel tank declared	199.7 qt · 189.0 L	95.1 qt · 90.0 L	+110% MX 90 C

Source

Source